Publication Name	World Journal of Radiology
Manuscript ID	3427
Country	United States

Received	2013-04-29 15:40
Peer-Review Started	2013-05-02 14:24
To Make the First Decision	2013-05-28 12:05
Return for Revision	2013-06-09 16:52
Revised	2013-06-27 07:54
Second Decision	2013-07-18 17:50
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief
Accepted by Company Editor-in-Chief	2013-07-19 02:13
Articles in Press
Publication Fee Transferred
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor
Typeset the Manuscript	2013-08-22 11:23
Publish the Manuscript Online	2013-08-28 14:41

ISSN	1949-8470 (online)
Open Access
Copyright
Article Reprints	For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
Permissions	For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
Publisher	Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Website	http://www.wjgnet.com

Category	Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Manuscript Type	Autobiography
Article Title	3.0 Tesla vs 1.5 Tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients
Manuscript Source	Invited Manuscript
All Author List	Reni S Butler, Christine Chen, Reena Vashi, Regina J Hooley and Liane E Philpotts
Funding Agency and Grant Number
Corresponding Author	Reni S Butler, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, 70 Woodside Road, Guilford, CT 06437, United States. reni.butler@yahoo.com
Key Words	Breast; Breast cancer; Cancer staging; Outcome; Magnetic resonance imaging; Breast magnetic resonance imaging; 3 Tesla; Technical
Core Tip	3.0 Tesla (T) breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging offers superior image quality through improved signal-to-noise ratio and resolution. In a comparison of two nearly identical patient populations of women with newly diagnosed breast cancer, a greater number of suspicious lesions and mammographically occult malignancies were detected using an optimized 3.0T system compared to a conventional 1.5T system. The positive predictive value of an abnormal MR imaging study was higher for 3.0T MR imaging compared to 1.5T imaging. These results attest to a clinical benefit and higher accuracy achievable with a 3.0T magnet.
Publish Date	2013-08-28 14:41
Citation	Butler RS, Chen C, Vashi R, Hooley RJ, Philpotts LE. 3.0 Tesla vs 1.5 Tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. World J Radiol 2013; 5(8): 285-294
URL	http://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v5/i8/285.htm
DOI	http://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v5.i8.285

Full Article (PDF)	WJR-5-285.pdf
Manuscript File	3427-Review.docx
Answering Reviewers	3427-Answering reviewers.pdf
Copyright License Agreement	3427-Copyright assignment.pdf
Peer-review Report	3427-Peer review.pdf
Scientific Editor Work List	3427-Scientific editor work list.doc