Publication Name	World Journal of Gastroenterology
Manuscript ID	9168
Country	United States

Received	2014-01-24 09:12
Peer-Review Started	2014-01-24 09:48
To Make the First Decision	2014-02-28 21:25
Return for Revision	2014-03-06 19:55
Revised	2014-04-03 06:15
Second Decision	2014-07-16 17:03
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief
Accepted by Company Editor-in-Chief	2014-07-16 17:25
Articles in Press	2014-07-16 17:49
Publication Fee Transferred
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor
Typeset the Manuscript	2014-11-28 13:48
Publish the Manuscript Online	2014-12-20 19:42

ISSN	1007-9327 (print) and 2219-2840 (online)
Open Access
Copyright
Article Reprints	For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
Permissions	For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
Publisher	Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Website	http://www.wjgnet.com

Category	Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Manuscript Type	Retrospective Study
Article Title	Poor agreement between endoscopists and gastrointestinal pathologists for the interpretation of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy findings
Manuscript Source	Unsolicited Manuscript
All Author List	Shajan Peter, Leona Council, Ji Young Bang, Helmut Neumann, Klaus Mönkemüller, Shyam Varadarajulu and Charles Melbern Wilcox
Funding Agency and Grant Number
Corresponding Author	Shajan Peter, MD, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Alabama, 1808 7th Avenue South, BDB 380, Birmingham, AL 35294-0012, United States. shajan@uab.edu
Key Words	Key words: Confocal endomicroscopy; Gastointestinal; Interobserver variation
Core Tip	Confocal endomicroscopy (pCLE) has emerged as a valuable tool in the diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal disorders. It has helped the endoscopist to make real time decisions and targeted biopsies. Histopathology still remains the gold standard. We compared the interpretation of pCLE findings between an endoscopist and a dedicated GI pathologist and found there was a discrepency in the intepretation of the same findings between them. This is interesting as the endoscopist has a different approach of intepreting real time endomicroscopy compared to that of a pathologist.
Publish Date	2014-12-20 19:42
Citation	Peter S, Council L, Bang JY, Neumann H, Mönkemüller K, Varadarajulu S, Wilcox CM. Poor agreement between endoscopists and gastrointestinal pathologists for the interpretation of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy findings. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(47): 17993-18000
URL	http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i47/17993.htm
DOI	http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i47.17993

Full Article (PDF)	WJG-20-17993.pdf
Full Article (Word)	WJG-20-17993.doc
Manuscript File	9168-Review.docx
Answering Reviewers	9168-Answering reviewers.pdf
Copyright License Agreement	9168-Copyright assignment.pdf
Peer-review Report	9168-Peer review.pdf
Scientific Misconduct Check	9168-CorssCheck.jpg
Scientific Editor Work List	9168-Scientific editor work list.pdf