ISSN |
1948-5204 (online) |
Open Access |
This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
Copyright |
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. |
Article Reprints |
For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
|
Permissions |
For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
|
Publisher |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA |
Website |
http://www.wjgnet.com |
Category |
Gastroenterology & Hepatology |
Manuscript Type |
Retrospective Study |
Article Title |
Endoscopic mucosal resection vs endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial non-ampullary duodenal tumors
|
Manuscript Source |
Invited Manuscript |
All Author List |
Mitsuru Esaki, Kazuhiro Haraguchi, Kazuya Akahoshi, Naru Tomoeda, Akira Aso, Soichi Itaba, Haruei Ogino, Yusuke Kitagawa, Hiroyuki Fujii, Kazuhiko Nakamura, Masaru Kubokawa, Naohiko Harada, Yosuke Minoda, Sho Suzuki, Eikichi Ihara and Yoshihiro Ogawa |
ORCID |
|
Funding Agency and Grant Number |
|
Corresponding Author |
Eikichi Ihara, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Doctor, Doctor, Senior Lecturer, Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan. eikichi@intmed3.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp |
Key Words |
Endoscopic mucosal resection; Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumor; Short-term; Outcome; Propensity score matching |
Core Tip |
The standard treatment for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) is controversial. We conducted a multi-center retrospective study, which aimed to compare the treatment outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with those of endoscopic submucosal dissection for SNADETs by propensity score matching analysis. Twenty-eight patients were matched in each group. EMR achieved shorter procedure time and hospital stay than endoscopic submucosal dissection without any significant differences in curability and safety. Therefore, EMR for SNADETs has an advantage in total medical costs of endoscopic treatment. |
Publish Date |
2020-08-12 09:10 |
Citation |
Esaki M, Haraguchi K, Akahoshi K, Tomoeda N, Aso A, Itaba S, Ogino H, Kitagawa Y, Fujii H, Nakamura K, Kubokawa M, Harada N, Minoda Y, Suzuki S, Ihara E, Ogawa Y. Endoscopic mucosal resection vs endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial non-ampullary duodenal tumors. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 12(8): 918-930 |
URL |
https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v12/i8/918.htm |
DOI |
https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v12.i8.918 |